Josh Blackman has a post about how a lawyer kept refusing to answer a hypothetical posed by one of the Justices. For some reason, many lawyers are too leary about answering them, but it usually means that the lawyer has never thought about the theory of their case.
Bloggers
Recent Posts
- TRC Call to Action #60: Aboriginal Beliefs and Spirituality and the Whiteman’s Gospel
- Professional Development and Training for Public Servants
- Call #61 - Church Funding of Permanent Community-Controlled Projects
- TRC 5 Years Later: National Council for Reconciliation Reporting Mechanisms
- Honouring Cindy Gladue: A Second Chance at Justice
- TRC Call to Action #52: Aboriginal Title - A Roadmap of Twists and Turns and Roadblocks
- TRC Call to Action #51: Transparency regarding legal opinions
- Happy New Year - Our Winter 2021 Semester
- Feature on Action & Justice Everyday: The Individual duty of Reconciliation
- 2020 Year End Reflections
Categories
- Aboriginal Law
- Agricultural law
- American Law
- Animal Law
- Blog News and Stuff
- Books
- Civil Procedure
- Constitutional Law
- Corporate & Securities Law
- Corporate Law
- Courts & Judiciary
- Creditor-Debtor Law
- Criminal Law & Procedure
- CSR
- Current Affairs
- Economic Policies
- Education
- Environmental Law
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Film
- Food and Drink
- Free Speech
- General Interest
- Health Law
- History
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Intellectual Property Law
- International Law
- Internet Law
- Judges
- Labor Law
- Law in General
- Law School and Students Issues
- Lawyers
- Legal History
- Leviathan & Regulatory State
- Literature
- Movies & Pop Culture
- Municipal Law
- Music
- Politics
- Pop Culture
- Property Law
- Religion
- Rule of Law
- Scholarship
- Science
- Sports
- Technology
- Television
- Tort Law
- Travel
Recent Comments
- ReconciliAction YEG on 5 Years After TRC: Midpoint Recap
- Sarah on IBA 2020 Reflections: A Conversation with Members of Parliament, Jaime Battiste and Jagmeet Singh
- Denis Lapierre on Colonial Education and Reconciliation: an Overview
- Kado Ulang Tahun on 5 Years After TRC: A National Standard
- L Douglas Rae on Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Legacy, Reconciliation, and the Doctrine of Discovery
- Mahoon Law on "To Catch a Predator": Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in R v Mills
- Rebecca Johnson on Gender in Mikomosis and the Wetiko
- gatsby parker on Law Society of Alberta: Steps Towards Reconciliation
- Treaty 6 Member on Judge Arcand-Kootenay encourages others to “dream big”
- Connectvhome on What's in a Name? Renaming and Reclaiming of Indigenous Space
Links
- Alberta Law Review
- Alberta Law Review Online Supplement
- All About Information
- AlphaInventions
- Blogosaurus Lex
- Criminal Review
- CSR Law
- Daveberta
- Double Aspect
- Energy Law Prof
- Fakirs Canada (Marnie Tunay)
- Health Law in British North America (Ubaka Ogbogu)
- Hon. Justice Bouck's Blog
- International Legal Commentary
- Irish for Rights
- Ivory Tower Pundit (L. Klar)
- Josh Blackman
- Law is Cool
- Legal Scholarship Blog
- LegalAve (Family Law in Alberta)
- LexisNexis Torts & Personal Injury Law Community
- Library Boy
- Lisa Hutch - The Trials
- MasterMaq
- Middle East and North African Legal Review
- Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History
- Overcoming Bias
- Overlawyered
- Pith and Substance
- Point of Law
- Post Secondary Education Blog
- Reason Online
- SLaw
- The Court (Osgoode Hall's Supreme Court Blog)
- Thought Capital
- University of Alberta Faculty of Law
- University of Alberta Law Library Blog
- University of Calgary Faculty of Law Blog
- University of Toronto Faculty of Law Blog
- Vancouver Law Librarian
Powered by TypePad