« Another nice mess | Main | Are printed textbooks on their way out? »

January 15, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834979b7d53ef0147e19b6dab970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A brief overview of CBSC music censorship.:

Comments

Marnie Tunay


Good one, Graham. :))

James Muir

Reading 94/95-0060 and 09.10-0818 together, it appears, to the contrary, that in the 16 years between the decisions the appropriateness of broadcasting the word may have changed or, if you like, the awareness of the CBSC regarding the effect of the word has changed.

GP

Thanks. Made some changes to the article accordingly. I can't argue with your criticism.

Gareth Morley

I agree it is likely that the difference shows change in attitude, rather than contradiction.

But I think it's interesting that we protect groups more precisely as they become less vulnerable. 1985 was the hieght of the AIDS epidemic (in the rich world, anyway) and the idea that people should be treated equally regardless of sexual orientation was still at least slightly radical. Today no urban mayor is going to miss the Pride parade.

Gareth Morley

I would say the claims of "censorship" are just cover for ugly culture war politics. As George Carlin pointed out a long time ago, no one has ever been able to say whatever they want on the air -- and there is approximately zero effort out there to change this. But the National Post gets all offended when "faggot" or "nigger" is bleeped out. I call fecal material of a male bovine.

David Cheifetz

Still, based on what I saw on "House" last week, it's ok in Canada - since I watched it on Global - to talk about (based on the show, heterosexual) adults shtupping. OTOH, it maybe that nobody on the CBSC knows what shtupping is. Or it's just too early because nobody has complained.

I see that the CBSC has "voluntarily" agreed to review it's decision at the "request" of the CRTC.

Gareth Morley

Top 40 radio is essentially pornographic nowadays. The implicit message of centuries of pop songs is implicit no longer. But they still bleep out the words Carlin wasn't allowed to say.

The comments to this entry are closed.

2007 Canadian Law Blog Awards Winner

2008 Canadian Law Blog Awards Finalist

2009 Canadian Law Blog Awards Winner

2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

Powered by TypePad