The Supreme Court of Judicature in the U.K. has ruled on whether Pringles are potato crisps (i.e. chips) or some other sort of savory snack. Much of the decision turns on ingredients. The unnatural stackability of the snacks was irrelevant.
« Absence | Main | BC's new Attorney General is ... »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834979b7d53ef011570b5e75c970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference When is a Crisp just a Crisp?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
According to Lord Justice Jacob, "This sort of question – a matter of classification - is not one calling for or justifying over-elaborate, almost mind-numbing legal analysis."
They then take 79 paragraphs.
Posted by: Gareth Morley | June 03, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Maybe L.J. Jacob was a tax lawyer before he became a judge.
I tried reading the judgment, - then I tried skimming it - but still couldn't force myself to get through it.
Posted by: Marnie Tunay | June 03, 2009 at 04:29 PM